Hi Jan,
thanks for your answer. however, How does this solution scale? I may have a large number of users behind NAT.
Is it possible to have a failover.. i.e. send to to rtpproxy1, if it is down/busy send to rtpproxy2, rtpproxy3, etc? From what I can see in the source code there can only be one rtpproxy at a time. Is this correct? Or am I missing something.
Is anyone deploying a large number of users using rtpproxy? What have you found?
regards, Andy
On Mon, 19 Apr 2004, Jan Janak wrote:
Most people are probably using rtpproxy.
Jan.
On 14-04 14:27, Andy Pyles wrote:
Hi, I'd like to get some recommendations from other users what the best option for an rtp proxy to use. From what I have seen the options are:
1.) Ser MEDIA proxy
2.) rtpproxy
3.) asterisk ( perhaps with some slight modifications )
What are people using? and any insight would be helpful, as to which model seems to work the best.
regards, Andy
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers