Hi Carsten,
you right about that.. without topoh module the branch is ok.
I did some test and all seem to work correctly.
I forgot to say that we used topoh for "mask" the real ip of the A-LEG
customer over platform, and without the topoh modules
i can see all the real ip in the Via: records.
Any solution for that ?
Thanks
Laura
Il 24/05/16 14:58, Carsten Bock ha scritto:
Hi Laura,
if it's just about advertising the IP, then you can simply do the following:
listen=udp:10.10.10.10:5060 advertise 11.11.11.11:5060
(
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/devel/core#listen)
which will put 11.11.11.11 instead of the own, local IP.
Thanks,
Carsten
2016-05-24 14:40 GMT+02:00 Laura <red_dra(a)plugit.net>et>:
> Hello,
>
>
> honestly we only use the topoh modules for this
>
> # topoh paramiters
> modparam("topoh", "mask_ip", "1.1.1.1")
>
> Pratically we created a cluster and we use VRRP for HA of the service.. so
> we use topoh for menage the virtual IP on kamailio..
>
> Is there any other way we could use for stop using topoh ?
>
> Regards
>
>
> Il 24/05/16 13:11, Daniel-Constantin Mierla ha scritto:
>
> Hello,
>
> the long Via branch is because of using topoh module. Do you need that?
>
> The alternatives would be:
>
> - disable topoh module
>
> - or configure the kernel to do udp defragmentation (should be default in
> modern linux)
>
> - or switch to tcp/tls
>
> - or try to use the new topos module in 4.4 -- not that it is not well
> tested and you should not go with it in production directly. Any issue
> encountered with topos should be reported on kamailio project on github and
> I will take care fixing them.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 24/05/16 09:57, Laura wrote:
>
> Good morning list,
>
> I need to ask you a question about a problem we are fighting on our VoIP
> platform based on Kamailio 4.3.5.
> Our platform is made by more nodes over Europe countries, and we are
> encountering a problem with the size of the SIP package which, exceeds
> the physiological limit of about 1350 bytes.
> The real problem is caused from Via: Header (inside the SIP packet)
> which is added to each element of the system for transit on the call.
> >From what we have analyzed, the problem is not so much due to the number
> of entered Via: records but, by the fact that they contain a branch
> parameter extremely long.
>
> Here the call flow example from CARRIER A —> Kamailio1 —> Kamailio2 —>
> CARRIER B
>
> Extract from SIP message sent from CARRIER A to K1
>
> INVITE sip:999912341234@192.168.158.42 SIP/2.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.220.141:5060;branch=z9hG4bK49e4301c;rport.
>
> Extract from SIP message sent from K1 to K2
>
> INVITE sip:999912341234@192.168.127.244 SIP/2.0.
> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.158.42;lr;did=194.a0f1;nat=yes>.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.158.42;branch=z9hG4bK0635.7c1e97c2d5c01ea98e8d0e7fa23a3822.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>
192.168.158.42;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycM.cuOBV4OBVLMGZfWxF-W.y6Mx1LgRWIC9gIgx4fzxj7MBP7MBVAOBF4M.1jmxuqC93X3heroEWvH9vsCFN43qd4zRj4Mlyf3l1LNSQLpx4uMx3A.
>
> Extract from SIP message sent from K2 to CARRIER B
>
> INVITE sip:999912341234@192.168.65.248 SIP/2.0.
> Record-Route: <sip:192.168.127.244;lr;did=194.5122;nat=yes>.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.127.244;branch=z9hG4bK0635.f843472880b380acde3a33732975fde9.0.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>
192.168.127.244;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycW.F7MBj4OBFuzGZ4MB1LNSQLpx4uMx3AzuaVHRaYpB1JNEt736cQkBIvalaJmly6Mlj7W6Mfg.qw3leqWRMAMRKrz.rIzSPAg.pE3.Vl3.MZMBV7My**.
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>
192.168.127.244;branch=z9hG4bKsr-j4IPOlV7MGQKatycW.F7MBj4OBFuzGZ4MB1JNEt736cQkBIvalaJmwWLORv4mK0Hot3w.jpam6t4kRWWOEWu.4eRWFQGKqfWauYEKwrSOKN7k.gWkxtMgue9mjMsg4IhkxaEkhrbW4uGjxpWPIg0.4eSWF47MRY1kUKfPlqlRxWvg9e5aKp6mxI6N4WS.BPlNRP4kIebWFudkR3loxtM.IWa.U0ZWUKWkxW0.
>
>
> Is there anyone here with the idea how to solve this problem ?
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>
http://www.asipto.com -
http://www.kamailio.org
>
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org