-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Bogdan,
Fistrly, thanks for your answer! Reading some old posts about 'branch=0' I found some one saying that it happend because SER forward statelessly, but I'm using "t_relay()" and I suppose it's a statefull function, does'n it? I saw this question many times in serusers maillist but no one answer it! According with RFC3261 'branch=0' is not a valid branch ID (I know I can use syn_branch=0)!
Best regards. - -- ============================================ Rodrigo P. Telles telles@devel.it Diretor de Tecnologia Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it ============================================
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Rodrigo,
as I see in that email, the problem is actually a broken ACK which doesn't match the INVITE transaction and statelessly loops on the proxy
- when statelessly fwded, the ACK gets branch=0 param in VIA.
so, what is your problem? - the actually presents of branch=0 or why it gets there?
regards, bogdan
Rodrigo P. Telles wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been experiencing some troubles with ACK's with branch=0. I found a thread about it but I didn't find a 'solution' folowing the thread. http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2005-April/004296.html
Can some one point me to the correct answer for that question?
Thanks in advance.
============================================ Rodrigo P. Telles telles@devel.it TI Manager Devel-IT - http://www.devel.it ============================================
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users