Hi Alex,
Yes I did, but I noticed that all in-dialog requests sent by freeswitch to kamailio were
ignored and no packet was generated from kamailio in this regard.
I'm not sure if t_relay is working as expected at my side.
Thanks.
Ali Taher
-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces(a)lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 4:34 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] in-dialog requests
Have you tried the config I suggested to you yesterday?
On July 18, 2018 9:32:01 AM EDT, Ali Taher <ataher(a)vanrise.com> wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Kamailio as a proxy behind freeswitch to alter some packets
(183
packets precisely).
Here is my scenario:
(---Customer---) --> ((port 5065)---Kamailio---) -->
((port5060)---Freeswitch---) --> (---Supplier---)
Here is my request route :
route{
if (is_method("INVITE")) {
xlog("L_INFO","INSIDE request route $si \n");
insert_hf("X-AUTH-IP: $si\r\n");
}
route(FWD);
}
reply_route {
#xlog("L_INFO","INSDE reply \n");
if (status == "183") {
change_reply_status(180, "Ringing");
exit;
}
}
route[FWD] {
#xlog("L_INFO","INSIDE FWD \n");
forward(X.X.X.X,5060);
}
Where X.X.X.X is the Freeswitch IP
This script is working normally as long as the customer is sending the
requests(INVITE,BYE,ACK,CANCEL..) . But when the supplier or freeswitch
initiated the request , above script causes loop where the packet is
bounced between kamailio and freeswitch.
As I know , loose_route is used to handle such requests , but I'm not
sure how to forward these packets to the customer after receiving them
from freeswitch.
I'm not sure also if what's I'm doing is statefull or stateless.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Ali Taher
-- Alex
--
Sent via mobile, please forgive typos and brevity.
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users