1. nope, i only have 1 instance of record_route in my config:
if (is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE")) record_route();
2. i already have:
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
Kelvin Chua
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Carsten Bock <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote:
Hi Kelvin,
1) it seems you do record_route() for INVITE and ACK? If you do it for
the ACK as well, why? Doing record_route() should only be necessary
for INVITE (& SUBSCRIBE).
2) You could also test, if
modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1)
would help. In this case, the first Record-Route-Header should also
contain "lr=on".
Kind regards,
Carsten
2013/11/28 Kelvin Chua <kelchy(a)gmail.com>om>:
i am using only record_route() and my setup is
dialog-aware. (dialog)
it's worth noting that i am doing serial fork, but this particular call
is
the first branch.
On Nov 28, 2013 11:38 PM, "Carsten Bock" <carsten(a)ng-voice.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Olle,
>
> actually it's an extension, i wanted to do sooner or later. If
> Kamailio is Dialog-Aware (e.g. dialog or dialog_ng is loaded),
> Kamailio "knows" what the route-set should be and could check and
> optionally enforce the route-set.
>
> By the way: In the Record-Route of the "200 OK" it's "lr" and
in the
> "ACK" the Record-Route is "lr=on".
> @Kelvin: You use only "record_route()" or do you have anything special
> in this regards in your config?
>
> Kind regards,
> Carsten
>
> 2013/11/28 Olle E. Johansson <oej(a)edvina.net>et>:
> >
> > On 28 Nov 2013, at 16:23, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/28/2013 10:22 AM, Kelvin Chua wrote:
> >>> hi alex,
> >>> is there a way for kamailio to force lr=on before relay? this
carrier
> >>> is
> >>> driving me nuts
> >>
> >> No, Kamailio (as a SIP proxy) cannot modify the Route set after the
> >> dialog is set up, in a sequential (in-dialog request) furthermore.
> >
> > The client changed the syntax of the route set - but do you really
> > consider that a change of the route set, Alex?
> >
> > I guess the URI's are different.
> >
> > The question here is really - can Kamailio somehow clean up the URI's
in
> > the route set for this buggy client?
> >
> > /O
> > _______________________________________________
> > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Carsten Bock
CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH
Schomburgstr. 80
D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com
mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Office +49 40 34927219
Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189
Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock
Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben:
http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users