26 Oct
2005
26 Oct
'05
2:45 p.m.
Hi,
I posted on [serusers] regarding DNS SRV,t_replicate,backup server and
GS phones.
My test resut of BT101(1.0.7.11-newest) and GXP2000(1.0.1.9) was
no good.
My question is eventhough we set up DNS SRV on server side, if sip
clients does not suppot DNS SRV, do we have a risk of (5+5)minutes
out of service time when we set up 5 minutes REGISTER intervals?
If UA have multiple REGISTERs outgoing lines such as GXP2000,
we could set up Line1 for sip1&sip2(DNS SRV) Line2 for sip3 server.
In this case if line1 does not work, the user can use Line2.
Xlite can register 3 sip servers, but only default sip proxy can
use as outgoing line, so the Xlite users have (5+5)minutes out of
service risk.
Does Cisco 7960 work perfectly on DNS SRV?
Regards,
Zen
Helge Waastad wrote :
Hi,
I've started to add some more information to voip-info.
I'm still waiting for response from Grandstream and others on their
support (or future support) for DNS SRV.
br hw
On Wed, 2005-10-19 at 17:32 +0200, Klaus Darilion wrote:
Hi Helge!
According to my tests, also SNOM can do SRV based failover.
I've published my test results at:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/SRV+implementations
Please add your test results to this.
regards
klaus
Helge Waastad wrote:
--
mvh/best regards
Helge Waastad
System Engineer
Smartnet
(+47)67830017
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Hi,
this is not a technical question regarding OpenSER, but more of req for
information.
I'm using Cisco phones and gateways and have implemented DNS SRV
redundancy.
However, I have never seen a SIP phone that really works with DNS SRV
redundancy, except from Cisco. (which actually works as a charm)
Does anyone know other phones that can use dns srv for redundancy?
At least Cisco tries the next DNS SRV entry if it receives a port
unreachable from the highest priority proxy...