23 Oct
2006
23 Oct
'06
11:18 a.m.
Yes. All dialog-creating or non-dialog initial requests that are not
part of a transaction should be NAT-handled as an INVITE (and looked up
etc).
g-)
Andrey Kuprianov wrote:
Btw, Greger, does the same go for SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY
requests?
On 10/20/06, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote:
MESSAGE should be NAT-handled as an INVITE.
g-)
Mark Price wrote:
Hi,
I'm finding that my ser clients can't can only unreliably communicate
using
MESSAGE packets, and that presence and presence subscriptions are
equally
unreliable (i.e. very).
The odd thing is that they do sometimes, in fact, work.
Anyways, I discovered that there are definitely NAT issues going on,
since I
can see inbound MESSAGE packets banging on the outside of my firewall.
What are people doing to mitigate this?
Mark
________________________________
_______________________________________________
Serusers
mailing
list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers