11 Apr
2005
11 Apr
'05
10:03 a.m.
If you see another thread (using the rather intuitive subject: Re:
[Serusers] more usrloc synchronization), you will see discussions on using
LVS in general. AFAIK, which high availability solution to use for LVS, is
more based on your personal preferences, UltraMonkey is probably a safe
choice. Anyway, you will need to address the "stickiness" issue.
g-)
Matt Schulte wrote:
Has anyone attempted to load balance SER using
Ultramonkey/ldirectord?
I've noticed all it does is pretty much NAT and send requests
accordingly, the trick I guess would be the NAT part. If the SIP
headers = myself, would there really be any issues? One problem I can
foresee is the possibility that loose routing would hit the wrong
server. Just wanted to ask around before I wasted time trying it out
for myself :-) Thanks
Matt
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers