17 Mar
2005
17 Mar
'05
2:55 p.m.
Zeus,
Here is a call log between two SIP phones on my SER proxy.
I am using remove_hf("Proxy-Authorization") before I t_relay() the
message, so you will see the Proxy-Authorization in the header between
my SIP Phone and SER.
Also, note that my SER proxy sits behind a Cisco 3600 so the ALG in
Cisco rewrites the 10.3.0.0 network addresses.
I've got no idea why the ACK contains the Proxy-Auth header, unless it
is a bug in my Grandstream phone. Who knows.
Regards,
Paul
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:31:50 +1100, Zeus Ng <zeus.ng(a)isquare.com.au> wrote:
Just curious, under what situation did you get
Proxy-Authorization header
with ACK? I never saw one before and am interested to know.
Yes, that's what I thought. But the documentation does say that
www_authorize() or proxy_authorize() must be called prior to
consume_credentials().
In my case I see the Proxy-Authorization header in ACK and
BYE messages, so calling www_authorize() or proxy_authorize()
isn't called and consume_credentials() doesn't appear to
remove the header in these cases.
It does work when processing INVITE messages, however.
Regards,
Paul
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:51:56 -0500, Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org> wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Yes, consume_credentials should remove them.
Jan.
On 16-03 08:52, Java Rockx wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> Should consume_credentials() remove the
Proxy-Authorization header
from my
SIP messages before I t_relay() them?
If not, how should I remove the header? Use remove_hf() ?
Regards,
Paul
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers