Hi,
We are also having a problem with X-Pro and X-lite build 1088
when registering to a SIP proxy based on libosip. The X-Pro is not using the
double-quotes on the nonce value of the Authorization header, which is causing
an error on our proxy when parsing of this header (Libosip requires the double
quotes).
I have sent this question to the Xten support forum but they said that
the double quotes are not mandatory, though libosip requires them.
Any thoughts on what is the correct behaviour of the double-quotes
on the authorization header?
Thanks,
Chuck
########
REGISTER sip:sip.myproxy.com SIP/2.0..
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
10.0.0.118:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bK68B8733FC802462491336DC291698245..
From: 55519 <sip:55519@sip.myproxy.com>..
To: 55519
<sip:55519@sip.trd c.telenova.com.br>..
Contact: "55519"
<sip:55519@10.0.0.118:5060>..
Call-ID:
C6A03D06E92E4797964B8B66D428E345@sip.myproxy.com..
CSeq: 50473 REGISTER..Expires: 1800..
Authorization: Digest
username="55519",realm="sip.myproxy.com",nonce=3fc651184ade4892f2e774000507b
8b0a1db524e,response="19a55431e3ee1d5978c777373a822a40",uri="sip:sip.myproxy
.com"..
Max-Forwards: 70..
User-Agent: X-PRO build 1088..
Content-Length: 0....
Klaus Darilion <darilion@ict.tuwien.ac.at>
wrote:
PS:
nevertheless build 1095 (as 1088) is IMO buggy as it doesn't
register to
my default proxy, but to all other configured proxies.
Any
solutions?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxim
Sobolev [mailto:sobomax@portaone.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10,
2003 5:56 PM
> To: Ricardo Villa
> Cc: Klaus Darilion; Jan
Janak; Adrian Georgescu; serusers@lists.iptel.org
> Subject: Re: [Serusers]
Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio
>
>
> Ok, I see, probably
it tries to send a RTCP packet, which is OK by
> itself, but handles
resulting ICMP in a strange way. I'll extend RTP
> proxy to make it
relaying RTCP traffic as well (I am having
> it on a TODO
>
list for a quite some time now), which should fix this problem.
>
> Thank you for the debugging!
>
> In the meantime,
disabling RTCP in X-Ten should solve the problem.
>
>
-Maxim
>
> Ricardo Villa wrote:
>
> > I can
confirm this too. Just tried it in our lab with the
> exact
same
> > results as Klaus. (Instead of Budgetone I used
ATA186).
> >
> > X-Lite build 1084
> >
>
> 1. ATA186 Calls Xten.
> > 2. Xten hears choppy audio every 5
seconds or so.
> > 3. RTP Stream from ATA to Xten is perfect and
conserves
> the same SSRC
> > 4. RTP Stream from Xten to ATA
switches to a new SSRC
> every few seconds.
> >
>
> It is clear to me that there is a bug in Xten software. Before
Xten
> > switches to a new SSRC it attempts to send an RTP packet
to
> the wrong RTP
> > Port (it tries to the actual port
+1). SER server sends
> back "ICMP Port
> > Unreacheable
(Obviously)" and Xten restarts RTP Stream on a
&! gt; new
SSRC.
> >
> > I did not see any problem with Maxims
RTPProxy.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ricardo
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Klaus
Darilion"
> > To: "Jan Janak"
; "Adrian Georgescu"
> >
> > Cc: ; "Ricardo Villa"
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:07
AM
> > Subject: RE: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy
audio
> >
> >
> > I can reproduce the choppy
audio
> > setup:
> > budgetone-100 <---->
ser+rtpproxy(version from today) on
> redhat 9 (or 8,
> >
not sure) <------>x-lite build 1088 on win xp
> >
>
> the choppy sound occours every 5 seconds, in both directions.
>
> RTP-analysis:
> > RTP stream from budgetone to ! x-lite (via
rtpproxy) is fine
> (no jitter,
> > no loss)
> >
RTP stream from x-lite to budgetone (via rtpproxy): very
> strange:
x-lite
> > switches to a new SSRC (and seq-nr. start at 0 again)
every
> 5 seconds.
> >
> > so, in my opinion:
rtpproxy works fine, x-lite is guilty.
> but why does
> >
this happen only if the rtp proxy is involved? ...further
>
investigations
> > are planned...
> >
> >
Klaus
> >
> >
> >>-----Original
Message-----
> >>From: Jan Janak
[mailto:janak@fokus.fraunhofer.de]
> >>Sent: Wednesday, December
10, 2003 4:09 PM
> >>To: Adrian Georgescu
> >>Cc:
serusers@lists.iptel.org; Ricardo Villa
> >>Subject: Re: [Serusers]
Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio
> >>
> >>
>
>>Well, we can generate the traces locally, but I haven't
&g!
t; encounter the
> >>problem you describe so it makes no
sense.
> >>
> >>You wrote you are able to reproduce
the problem, in that
> case I would
> >>like to ask you
to generate the traces that show the problem
> >>so we
could
> >>analyze and fix it.
> >>
>
>>Also please tell us on what OS does this happen ? (I mean
the
> >>OS the proxy
> >>is running on).
>
>>
> >>Another question, what is the license of your RTP
proxy ? I
> >>didn't find
> >>any licensing info in
the sources. Will the sources be available ?
> >>
>
>> Jan.
> >>
> >>On 10-12 16:04, Adrian
Georgescu wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wednesday, Dec 10,
2003, at 15:48 Europe/Amsterdam,
> >>
> >>Ricardo
Villa
> >>
> >>>wrote:
>
>>>
> >>>
> >>>>Adrian,
>
>>>>
> >>>>Do you have an Etheral trace trace
of such a call (using G711)?
> >>>
> >>>I
guess ethereal traces can be generated with ethereal program and
>
>>>decoded locally on your servers if you want to isolate
this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I
can
> >>>>decode it and produce an audio file for all to
examine.
> >>
> >>This way we
>
>>
> >>>>can get
> >>>>to the
bottom of this.
> >>>>Thanks,
>
>>>>Ricardo
> >>>
>
>>>_______________________________________________
>
>>>Serusers mailing list
>
>>>serusers@lists.iptel.org
>
>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>>
>
>>_______________________________________________
>
>>Serusers mailing list
> >>serusers@lists.iptel.org
>
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
> > Serusers
mailing list
> > serusers@lists.iptel.org
> >
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing
list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Do you Yahoo!?
Free
Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now