24 Sep
2020
24 Sep
'20
11:27 p.m.
Hi,
A bit of debug in rtpproxy: I found out that if I use -l 10.10.111.234
instead of -l 0.0.0.0 in the command line, it's working as expected.
I'm not able to understand if this is a bug, or an expected behavior.
Sorry that I answered my question alone ;)
Regards
Aymeric
Le jeu. 24 sept. 2020 à 17:49, Aymeric Moizard <amoizard(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
A bit more information on the rtpproxy and kamailio
exchange: this is what
I receive on rtpproxy (2.1.0)
DBUG:GLOBAL:get_command: received command "11479_4 Uc18,8,0,101 109865504
90.66.177.103 30250 4178279503;1"
INFO:GLOBAL:rtpp_command_ul_handle: new IPv4/IPv4 session 109865504, tag
4178279503;1 requested, type strong
INFO:109865504:rtpp_command_ul_handle: new session on IPv4 port 51694
created, tag 4178279503;1
Regards,
Aymeric
Le jeu. 24 sept. 2020 à 15:33, Aymeric Moizard <amoizard(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
--
Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
Hi,
I have 2 hosts on AWS behind NAT:
One with rtpproxy:
/usr/local/bin/rtpproxy -f -p /run/rtpproxy/rtpproxy.pid -s udp:
0.0.0.0:31500 -A 15.236.230.177 <http://15.236.230.177/15.236.230.177> -l
0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0> -m 35000 -M 65000 -d DBUG:LOG_LOCAL5 -u
rtpproxy:rtpproxy -F
The other one, with a kamailio and using only rtpproxy_manage(); without
parameters.
I'm surprised because in my SDP being modified, kamailio is replacing
with its KAMILIO private IP. (not the rtpproxy one)
I see that rtpproxy and kamailio are exchanging data. Nothing obvious
is coming out.
Any obvious mistakes?
Anything you need to help?
Should I switch to another rtp engine?
Regards
Aymeric
--
Antisip - http://www.antisip.com
--
Antisip - http://www.antisip.com