25 Oct
2010
25 Oct
'10
12:35 p.m.
2010/10/25 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
It's more curiosity than need. But anyhow I'm 90% sure that if you set
a bflag in route then it will be set for all the branches generated
during loockup(location). Not sure what happens in case of serial
forking using append_branch() in failure_route...
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc(a)aliax.net>
why are you using "i:1"? The parameter must
be just 1.
Sorry, just a typo in the mail :)
, so the bflag
will be set
for all the branches that could be generated for this incoming
transaction. This also involves creating new branches manually under
failure_route, am I right?
Note: I do know that it would be much better just to use flag instead of
bflags.
2) The outgoing transaction(s) fail so I enter into failure_route. If
I inspect here bflag(i:1) will it be set or not? I remember that it
will be set.
3) Then I call append_branch in failure_route, or perhaps call
loockup("location") and I expect that all the generated branches will
have the bflag set, am I right?
never used in this way, but the normal usage is per branch and when you do
it in the main route then it is just for first branch.