23 Apr
2014
23 Apr
'14
1:36 p.m.
On 04/23/14 13:24, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 04/23/2014 01:22 PM, Richard Fuchs wrote:
Correct, it would be sending a delete to the proxy. I'm not certain that
instead sending an offer is indeed the expected behaviour.
cheers
Main selection criterion is whether the message
is a request or a
reply, second criterion is the SIP method (taken from the CSeq)
and/or the response code in case of a reply. The route type is only
marginally relevant.
Yeah, so the key question is: what is the message we are acting upon?
It it is my theory that in a request route that is called from a
failure_route that is triggered by a 302 reply, the message being
operated on is actually the 302 reply, and not an initial INVITE. And
that's why it doesn't produce the offer command as expected.