18 Mar
2008
18 Mar
'08
10:55 a.m.
Hello,
if you asked on this list, then I recommend using openser for peering
:-) -- of course using it with tls will provide you inter-connection
security and privacy.
Using an extra openser box is a matter of you architecture design --
should be more modular and scale better, but will add a bit of more
complexity in platform management. The main reason I see to use an extra
box is that when you need to change peering rules the rest of sevice is
not affected as you will change the config of the peering openser only.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/12/08 15:51, Ion Minzu wrote:
Hi,
The architecture looks like this:
PSTN <-> AS5300 <-> openser(non_tls) <-> IP-PBX's (asterisk)
^ ^
^ billing^ (radius)
i want to interconnect with another operator trough sip.
i think about two methods:
-using AS5300
-directly to openser.
what method do you recommend for me?
and how do you think it's resonable to instal another openser with tls wich will
function like session
border controller for interconnections with operators through sip.
The goal is to not change the architecture of billing and existing SIP proxy.
i've read something on the sipforum but i am interested if someone has some
experience in such cases,
taking into consideration that fact that operators use different equipment that supports
sip.
i mean that i want in result something like this:
|
|
PSTN <-|-> AS5300 <->
| ^ openser(non_tls) <-> IP-PBX's (asterisk)
SIP <-|-> openser<-> ^
| ^ ^
| ^ billing^ (radius)
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users