Hi Henning,
Thanks for you reply.
For this particular issue, I am more interested in sharing the event that we have received
a register request rather then syncing the registrar database.
On a replicated REGISTER the other nodes does not perform any registrar operation.
The registrar nodes are currently using usrloc with db-only mode and using a shared DB
cluster, to sync data.
However, I see the point of using DMQ_USRLOC for syncing between nodes instead of sharing
a database.
In such setup, do you typically use separate DBs on each node? or can you use a shared db
cluster as well?
Will it work good in a primary - primary setup where multiple nodes handles incoming
requests?
Best Regards,
Lars
________________________________
From: Henning Westerholt <hw(a)skalatan.de>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2019 7:39 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Lars Olsson
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] DMQ: dmq_t_replicate()
Hello Lars,
maybe I did not understood your scenario correctly.
But if your use case is just to replicate all registrations to another Kamailio instance,
you just add the dmq_usrloc module and enable the synchronization. It should work right
out of the box.
Cheers,
Henning
Am 26.06.19 um 10:39 schrieb Lars Olsson:
Hi,
I am trying to replicate a REGISTER request between several nodes.
When I am using dmq_t_replicate(), it ends the execution of the script.
It this correct or I have missed anything?
I can not find anything in the documentation of the DMQ module the says that it will end
the script execution.
Is it recommended to use the DMQ module or should I simply forward the request instead as
described in
https://medium.com/@tumalevich/kamailio-registration-replication-without-dm…
Best Regards,
Lars
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Henning Westerholt -
https://skalatan.de/blog/
Kamailio services -
https://skalatan.de/services