20 Dec
2018
20 Dec
'18
3:34 p.m.
Hello,
I haven't looked at specs: is there a requirement that the branch for
ACK of negative replies to be same as for INVITE for a stateless proxy?
A stateless proxy forgets everything about the INVITE as soon as it
sends it out and start processing the next request.
Eventually we can look at the code and see if we can use the same
algorithm to generate the branch value.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 19.12.18 22:31, Serge S. Yuriev wrote:
Hello,
Anyone?
--
Wbr, Serge via mobile
17.12.2018, 19:48, "Serge S. Yuriev" <me(a)nevian.org>rg>:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC,
USA -- www.asipto.com
Hello,
I'm trying to build pretty simple stateless proxy to stay between gw and
softswitch. Most working properly but not for non200 ACKs.
For some reason softswitch not accepting my ACK.
Trace (note different branch in top Via for INVITE and ACK towards
switch)
https://pastebin.freeswitch.org/view/8f1433b0
Simplified script
https://pastebin.com/u9DTSqcS
I'm pretty new to this so believe doing something wrong.
--
Serge S. Yuriev
Senior VoIP engineer
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users