Carsten
Am Mittwoch, den 29.04.2009, 16:41 +0200 schrieb Daniel-Constantin
Mierla:
Hello,
On 04/29/2009 03:03 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi,
unfortunately the changes between the 1.3 and 1.4 Version only affect
documentation...
Since the differences between dialog/dlg_request_within.c are also not
worth mentioning, i believe, the error lies somewhere in tm-module or
even in the core of 1.3.
it is changed/restored using the data lump system. I will check although
I do not remember big changes in the past, but 1.3 is quite old by now,
so my memory can fail...
Cheers,
Daniel
> Carsten
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2009, 18:54 +0200 schrieb Daniel-Constantin
> Mierla:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> have you tried to trace major changes between 1.3 and 1.4versions in
>> uac/from.c?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 04/23/2009 11:55 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this only happens, when the replacement-From-Header is shorter than the
>>> existing one. The number of "\0" represents the number of
characters
>>> removed from the request.
>>> Also, i forgot to mention one other, important issue: This happens only,
>>> if we terminate the call using the dialog-module... in all other cases
>>> this is fine.
>>> It also seems, that this only occurs in the old 1.3 release, in 1.4 this
>>> looks ok.
>>>
>>> Carsten
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am Mittwoch, den 22.04.2009, 21:55 +0200 schrieb Daniel-Constantin
>>> Mierla:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On 04/22/2009 06:26 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> short question:
>>>>> I've noticed, when the UAC-Module (from 1.3) replaces the
From-Headerin
>>>>> subsequential requests, the From-Header is filled up with
"zeros".
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> this is strange. How many zeros -- is there a relation between original
>>>> size and number of zeros? Does it happen in all cases?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> For most clients this is absolutely fine (tested with Snom's,
AVM's,
>>>>> Cisco's and many more). I've noticed, that some Zyxel devices
however do
>>>>> not like this and ignore the request in this case...
>>>>> Is this somehow defined in the RFC? Can somebody give me hint on a
>>>>> chapter or something? Or does it break the RFC?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> Carsten
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
>>> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>>>
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Users mailing list
> Users(a)lists.kamailio.org
>
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>