----- Original Message -----

From: Rosario Pingaro

To: serusers@lists.iptel.org

Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:04 PM

Subject: Re: [Serusers] blocking CID continuing using radius authentication

Sorry the ser.cfg part that fails when I block cid on my ata is the following:

       if (!allow_trusted()) {
                if (!radius_proxy_authorize("")) {
                        proxy_challenge("", "0");
                        break;
                } else if (!check_from()) {
                        sl_send_reply("403","Setta From=ID");
                        break;
                };

 

        };

So it is not just a matter of credentials.....

please note that the ata has the "sip-Remot-party-ID" enabled.

 

Any idea on supporting the block of the cid in my design?

 

Regards

Rosario

----- Original Message -----

From: Rosario Pingaro

To: serusers@lists.iptel.org

Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 9:57 AM

Subject: [Serusers] blocking CID continuing using radius authentication

I would like to use the ATAs features to block the CID for anonymous calls.

 

At the same time I wouldn't like to break my accounting done by Radius Authentication.

 

This is the ser.cfg about radius auth for international calls:

 

 if (!radius_is_user_in("From","int")) {
                                sl_send_reply("403","Internazionali non abilitate");
                                break;

I use to authenticate the "From" field so if I disable the CID on the ata I will receive an anonymous from field. 

What do I have to authenticate to mantain a working accounting? Do I have to authenticate against "Credentials"?

What is the difference between Credentials and from headers?

 

Regards

 

Rosario

---

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

---

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers