18 Aug
2005
18 Aug
'05
2:15 p.m.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Looking at this issue, I am wondering if worth to add
the
pseudovariables $dh and $dp for destination host and port ... Also I
am considering to change a bit the $du reference so when the dst_uri
is not set to point to request URI. Would be these changes usefully?
Hi Daniel!
This reveals another question: What is the difference between: request
URI, first branch, all branches, destionation sets .....
I used xlog to log all this pseude variables just before t_relay.
first branch: $br=sip:klaus@10.10.0.50:8718
all branches: $bR=sip:klaus@10.10.0.50:8718
destination set: $ds=Contact: sip:klaus@83.136.33.19:5060,
sip:klaus@10.10.0.50:8718
destination uri: $du=<null>
request uri: $ru=sip:klaus@83.136.33.19:5060
In the above call scenario, there is just lookup() which reveals 2
contacts, one with public IP and one with NATed IP (received structure
used).
Can you please describe the difference of these variables?
- Why does the destination set contains the NATed IP instead of the
received-IP?
- Why does all branches only shows the first one?
- Why is the request URI different to the first branch?
regards
klaus