21 Mar
2007
21 Mar
'07
3:33 p.m.
Hi Guys
The reason I have not yet gotten the new rpms up is because of the new
dependency on xmlrpc-c which is very broken on 64bit. I spent several hours
on it last week, but still haven't got everything building correctly and ran
out of time. I will try to have a look at it again in the next few days..
-Peter
On Wed 21 Mar 2007 16:23, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
Peter Nixon did great job with RPM packaging in the past. I have seen
that some 1.2.0 RPMs are now available on opensuse mirror (it has RPMs
for many distros, not only SUSE):
http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/telephony/openSUSE_10.2/i586
/
http://software.opensuse.org/download/server:/telephony/
I couldn't spot any of new included packages. I have no RMPs based
distro to play with it at my wish by now, I did blind update of specs.
Maybe he can give some update of his plans.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 03/20/07 21:34, Alan Crosswell wrote:
> The BuildPrereq lines in the RPM SPEC file for Fedora Core
> (openser.spec.fedora) supplied with 1.2.0 references debian names for
> the package (e.g. libxml2-dev -> libxml2-devel). Before I waste too
> much time finding the equivalent RHEL and/or Fedora Core packages that
> do the job, I thought I would ask her if anyone else has done so.
>
> If not, I'll make sure to submit patches for the SPECs once I figure
> them out. I am really looking to build on RHEL4 but clearly will need
> to grab some RPMs from Fedora Core....
>
> Please no religious rants about Debian vs. RHEL vs. Fedora vs. SuSE and
> so on:-)
>
> /a
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users(a)openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc