so just to get a summary out of this, is there a way to do load balancing, and f so is this without LVS and dispatcher, I havent tried either, just figured I'd wait until the dust had settled.
iqbal
Greger V. Teigre wrote:
LVS can do UDP load distribution based on UA's IP address. i think that is what Pietro suggests. Then the receiving SER must know where the call should go. Such a solution will anyway be reliant on a single server, as Juha pointed out. g-)
Iqbal wrote:
would lvs do this, I mean doesnt it have a problem with udp/SIP judging by the threads u mentioned and those on lvs list.
Iqbal
On 5/12/2005, "Juha Heinanen" jh@tutpro.com wrote:
Pietro Ravasio writes:
When UA_A calls UA_B, its INVITE will reach the same SER it has previously registered to (SER_1, thanks to LVS persistence), SER_1 will then look for UA_B and will notice that it is registered as UA_B@ser2.domain.com, DNS will be queried and SER_2 will be contacted in order to handle INVITE and send it to UA_B through already opened UDP channel (resolving NAT).
what happens if ser_1 or ser_2 is down when this call takes place?
Have you got any suggestion/comment?
i don't at all like an idea of mixing a third component (asterisk) to this. the whole thing should be doable with sers and load balancers alone.
-- juha
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.