10 Nov
2003
10 Nov
'03
5:44 p.m.
Jan Janak wrote:
Greg,
On 10-11 10:12, Greg Fausak wrote:
ah. version 0.8.11 has uncached subscriber table.
was subscriber cached in 0.8.10?
the next version is 0.8.12? any eta? I can test the cvs
stuff if it is in there. i hope there is a 'check the cache and
if the location isn't registered there then check the database' mode.
Upon further reflection this may be problematic...should probably always
check the database.
Thanks,
---greg
The subscriber table can be written to directly
_outside_ the
control of SER? I go out of my way to do a 'add user' in serctl
instead of inserting into the table. I have experienced caching
problems.
Currently there is no cache for subscriber table, so it can be updated
directly. Location and domain tables are cached.
Can the
subscriber and location tables be uncached? Such that I can
insert into either table and any running copy of SER will query the
database instead of the in memory cache?
Subscriber table is uncached right now. The possibility to disable cache for
location table will be included in the next release.
Jan.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers