10 Dec
2020
10 Dec
'20
2 p.m.
I noticed the exact same behaviour with my implementation, even though the
priority and rweight are different.
until now, i'm ignoring the "issue". But if there is a fix, I would like to
know too.
*Sérgio Charrua*
*www.voip.pt <http://www.voip.pt/>*
Tel.: +351 <callto:+351+91+104+12+66>21 130 71 77
Email : *sergio.charrua(a)voip.pt <sergio.charrua(a)voip.pt>*
This message and any files or documents attached are strictly confidential
or otherwise legally protected.
It is intended only for the individual or entity named. If you are not the
named addressee or have received this email in error, please inform the
sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy or disclose
it or its contents or use it for any purpose. Please also note that
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:20 AM Володимир Іванець <volodyaivanets(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello all!
We are running Kamailio version 5.3.3 with 16 small Asterisk servers.
Kamailio uses a dispatcher module to distribute calls. Algorithm #11 is
selected. All destinations are configured with priority set to 50 and
attribute to rweight=50.
We noticed that one server constantly receives more calls than others. I
run a few tests. I was sending 1000 calls to the system. 4 per second. All
servers except one were getting around 60 calls while the last one - around
100.
I then noticed that the server which receives most calls is always last in
the "kamcmd dispatcher.list" command output. I then changed the order in
the dispatcher DB table and repeat the test. The other server that now was
last was getting the most calls.
Does anyone else use algorithm #11 and finds the same thing? Is there
something additional that I can provide to help with the investigation?
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users