Hi,
SER and freeradius should be installed in the same host, for acc or auth?
regards, Carlos
----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucas Aimaretto" lucas@cyneric.com To: o-zone@zerozone.it; serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 1:29 PM Subject: RE: [Serusers] Radius Acc
Hi there. I've a question for you. Are you getting correctly the Acct-Stop records ? .... if so, how did you configure your ser.cfg, because I'm only getting Acct-Start records, for both
INVITE and BYE
messages.
I've solved using setflag(1) after route {, in this way:
[....CUT....] # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "radius_missed_flag", 3)
# ------------------------- request routing logic -------------------
# main routing logic
route{ setflag(1); if (method=="REGISTER") log(1, "REGISTER message received\n");
if (method=="INVITE") log(1, "INVITE message received\n"); if (method=="ACK") log(1, "ACK message received\n"); if (method=="BYE") log(1, "BYE message received\n");
[...CUT...]
Thanx for answering ... but your configuration did not help me at all. Look at my ser.cfg ...
# -- RADIUS ACC -- modparam("acc", "radius_config", "/etc/radiusclient.conf") modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "radius_missed_flag", 3) modparam("acc", "log_level", 2)
route{
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; record_route(); if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; if (uri==myself) { setflag(1); if (method=="REGISTER") { log(1, "REGISTER message received\n"); if (!radius_www_authorize("")) { www_challenge("", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; if (method=="INVITE") { log(1, "INVITE message received\n"); }; if (method=="ACK") { log(1, "ACK message received\n"); };
};
t_relay();
.... with this configuration ... I'm getting this Radius Output ...
radrecv: Accounting Request from host c0a801fd code=4, id=216, length=278 Acct-Status-Type = Start Service-Type = Sip-Session Sip-Response-Code = 200 Sip-Method = Invite User-Name = "1992005@192.168.1.253" Calling-Station-Id = "sip:1992005@192.168.1.253:11005" Called-Station-Id = "sip:1992001@192.168.1.253" Sip-Translated-Request-URI = "sip:1992001@192.168.1.113:11001;user=phone" Acct-Session-Id = "3F8FDBB3-E77D-4039-BE70-E89912A026E0@192.168.1.178" Sip-To-Tag = "e711b276be6653cb" Sip-From-Tag = "2604456034" Sip-CSeq = "19560" NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.1.253 NAS-Port-Id = 5060 Acct-Delay-Time = 0 Sending Accounting Ack of id 216 to c0a801fd (nas linux)
radrecv: Accounting Request from host c0a801fd code=4, id=217, length=278 Acct-Status-Type = Start Service-Type = Sip-Session Sip-Response-Code = 200 Sip-Method = Bye User-Name = "1992005@192.168.1.253" Calling-Station-Id = "sip:1992005@192.168.1.253:11005" Called-Station-Id = "sip:1992001@192.168.1.253" Sip-Translated-Request-URI = "sip:1992001@192.168.1.113:11001;user=phone" Acct-Session-Id = "3F8FDBB3-E77D-4039-BE70-E89912A026E0@192.168.1.178" Sip-To-Tag = "e711b276be6653cb" Sip-From-Tag = "2604456034" Sip-CSeq = "19560" NAS-IP-Address = 192.168.1.253 NAS-Port-Id = 5060 Acct-Delay-Time = 0 Sending Accounting Ack of id 217 to c0a801fd (nas linux)
Do you see ? ... first output corresponds to an INVITE message, and so an Acct-Start message is received. But, instantly, just after receiving the INVITE message, I get a BYE message, but it also corresponds to an Acct-Start message. I do not understand 2 things:
- Why am I receiving both messages instantly and ..
- Why the BYE message corresponds to an Acct-Start message.
Should not it be an Acct-Stop message ?
I just want to get an Acct-Stop message when Sip-Method == BYE or CANCEL. But I can not achieve that. I've tried configuring ser like this ...
if (method=="BYE" || method=="CANCEL") { setflag(1); };
... but the results where just the same.
I've been posting this problem many times but no one could answer to me. I just see some posts telling that people could do accounting but their configuration files are just the same as mine ... anyways ... if you have any hint, I'll really apreaciate it.
Regards,
Lucas
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.296 / Virus Database: 265.6.7 - Release Date: 30/12/2004
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers