ok, Thanks for answering ;)
I will reformulate
Using ser.cfg from onsip.org version 5.
When Uas register to ser, they are register with their privates IPs (192.168.xxx.xxx), not with the public Ip of the natted network. Making a call requires proxy authentification but ser WWW-Challenge never arrives to UA(wrong adress). Register works, even with authentification.
Any idea
In tha cfg, I have :
if (method=="INVITE" && client_nat_test("7")) { # INSERT YOUR IP ADDRESS HERE record_route_preset("82.146.xxx.xxx:5060;nat=yes"); } else if (method!="REGISTER") { record_route(); }; and also : if (!search("^Contact:[ ]**") && client_nat_test("7")) { setflag(6); fix_nated_register(); force_rport(); };
if (!www_authorize("finalcut.be","subscriber")) { www_challenge("finalcut.be","0"); break; };
-----Message d'origine----- De : Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Envoyé : jeudi 6 octobre 2005 14:10 À : Olivier Taylor; serusers@lists.iptel.org Objet : Re: [Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip
Olivier, You complained about no one answering your questions. An advise: When writing a question, please state clearly what you want to accomplish, what the problem is, and as much information about the problem as possible. I have rechecked some of your recent posts, they are all in telegraph language, and I find it very hard to understand what your question really is. To be honest, the below question really makes no sense to me. g-)
----- Original Message ----- From: Olivier Taylor mailto:olivier.taylor@gmail.com To: serusers@lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 01:44 PM Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy and private ip
Using the last cfg from onsip.org, i just see that now Uas are registered with their private Ip when using mediaproxy. Mediaproxy seems the best solution for scalability, that's why I want to test it.
Any Idea?
_____
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers