23 Nov
2005
23 Nov
'05
5:40 p.m.
Well, that depends. How many calls do you want to run simultaneously?
100 Calls on Mediaproxy can eat 100% of a 3.6 GHz Xeon CPU. 100 Calls
with rtpproxy only eats 2-3%. Its simple as to why. C vs Python.
--
Andres
Network Admin
http://www.telesip.net
Iqbal wrote:
I would say mediaproxy..have little logical reason
except that so far
no NAT issues with any client
Iqbal
Giovanni Balasso wrote:
> Alle 21:21, sabato 19 novembre 2005, a cairo ha scritto:
>
>
>> Terrible question:
>> Is mediaproxy better than rtp or STUN server for NAT problem ???
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Private Network for more than 1000 users
>> Public SER SERVER
>> Public Radius+MySQL
>> Public Patton MediaGW
>>
>>
>
>
> If users are all in private network stun can create hairpin problem
> but you should be able to run ser without stun, mediaproxy or rtpproxy.
>
http://www.telesip.net