17 Oct
2008
17 Oct
'08
6:53 p.m.
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Alex Balashov schrieb:
Well, thank you, I appreciate the insight. :)
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
Klaus Darilion wrote:
Better? hard to say
But at least more elegant and standard conform I guess as long as all the clients are
loose_routers (final target in
the RURI) it will work even without loose_route, if you only have 1
proxy between the clients.
Of course the forwarded in-dialgo requests will still have an Route
header which is actually not RFC conform but ignored by allmost all
SIP clients.
So, you're saying it's better to run loose_route() to have it consume
this extraneous Route: header?