5 Jun
2006
5 Jun
'06
6:30 p.m.
That did the trick!
I was using rewritehost(), forgot that the port slipped in there.
rewritehostport() removed the port from the redirect contact.
Thanks!
-g
On 6/5/06, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Greg,
that's great if it works now.. regarding the SRV lookup - as the log
says, no SRV and NAPTR lookups are done since the SIP URI specify a
port. Get rid of the port number from the contact uri if you want to
have naptr / srv lookup also.
regards,
bogdan
Greg Fausak wrote:
--
Greg Fausak
greg(a)thursday.com
Bogdan,
I recompiled openser and reinstalled, it's working for
me now. I think I hacked something up and caused it to break!
One thing I still am curious about.
I've got a domain name with an SRV record: ab5350.node-1.com, the
SRV (_sip._udp.ab5350.node-1.com) points to a single A record
proxy.ab5350.node-1.com. When I make that the Contact in
the redirect I get this in the syslog:
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: DEBUG: mk_proxy: doing DNS lookup...
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: DEBUG:sip_resolvehost2: has port -> do A
record lookup!
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: ERROR: mk_proxy: could not resolve
hostname: "ab5350.node-1.com"
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: ERROR: uri2proxy: bad host name in URI
<sip:+12143357976@ab5350.node-1.com:5060>
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: failure to
add branches
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: ERROR:tm:w_t_relay: t_forward_nonack failed
Jun 5 09:39:51 www openser: DEBUG:tm:relay_reply: branch=0, save=0,
relay=0
My code does a next_branches() followed by t_relay(). I thought that
t_relay() did the necessary SRV lookups?
If I change my redirect to return proxy.ab5350.node-1.com in the Contact
list, everything works as expected.
-g
On 6/5/06, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
yes - get_redirects("*") loads the
contacts from 3xx reply into branches
(as for parallel forking) ; serialize_branches(0) converts the branches
into AVPs for serial forking ; next_branches() gets the first AVP for
serial forking and push it as branch.
the message from next_branches() says all AVPs fro serial branches were
consumed - or none was present from the beginning.
regards,
Bogdan