On 25.09.2012 10:16, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
On 9/10/12 3:52 PM, Richard Brady wrote:
The other thing to consider within the "flow switching part" is the ability to "provide a limited version of a STUN server on the same interface and UDP port" as SIP.
this is implemented (or at least partial) - I had no chance to look better at it to know exactly how far it is, being developed during SER times. See the files ser_stun.{c,h} in the core.
Hi Richard! If you want to test it, make sure to enable the code with STUN=1 while building.
regards Klaus