There is the same problem in BYE, even in the BYE sent by the calee.
Jan.
On 15-09 12:44, Jan Janak wrote:
The ACK from Sjphone is broken, it contains
sip:202.125.84.163 in the
Request-URI but the Request-URI should be sip:202.125.84.163:1585 (port
is missing) because that's what the UA receives in 200 OK.
Jan.
On 15-09 15:22, mahesh wrote:
Hi Zeus,
I am attaching the ethereal captures of both fw1 and fw2(on wan
interfaces). Only relevant packets are shown in the capture to minimize the
file size.
The NAT IP used by fw1 is 202.125.84.164 and the one used by fw2 is
202.125.84.163
regards
Mahesh
>Mahesh,
>
>Given that you have ethereal capture, send it in to the list and we can see
>what's happening.
>
>Zeus
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org
>> [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of mahesh
>> Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 5:15 PM
>> To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>> Subject: [Serusers] Proxy sending ACK on port 5060 instead of
>> on contact port
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am using the following configuration to test SJPhone
>> through IPTEL proxy
>> server(publicly
>> available:195.37.77.99).
>>
>> HOST1(win2K)---FW1---Internet---FW2---HOST2(winXP)
>>
>> Host1 and Host2 are hosts with private IPs having SJPhone
>> application. FW1
>> and FW2 are
>> firewall/NAT devices with SIP-ALG implementation. This means
>> all the SIP
>> messages are modified to include the public IPs in them. Also the
>> via,contact ports are modified. Now both host1 and host2
>> register with the iptel proxy server. A call is initiated
>> from host1. Host2
>> sends 200 OK response
>> to the HOST1. After this the ACK sent by Host1 is sent to
>> port 5060 on
>> HOst2,instead of the
>> contact port advertised in 200 OK. This is observed from
>> ethereal captures
>> on Host2. All these
>> messages are going through the proxy server(195.37.77.99).
>>
>> Can someone please tell me why the proxy server is behaving
>> this way, i.e.
>> sending ACK on 5060
>> instead of the contact. Is there anything that i am missing
>> here or doing
>> wrong.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Mahesh
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers