Edson - Lists writes:
Should I open a bug ticket for this (since is a
generalization
mechanism), or is this more a feature request (since it's required by
this particular GW family)?
you can open a ticket. i have not had time to check a mime rfc if there
is a default value for boundary if ;boundary param is missing. if there
is no default value and the default value is not Boundary, then it is a
bug in the module. if Boundary is default value, then i would consider
it a feature request (i.e., add support for ;boundary param).
-- juha