Does sip.carrierTCP.net.br have DNS SRV records?!
g-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Thomas
To: Greger V. Teigre ; serusers@lists.iptel.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 11:28 PM
Subject: RE: [Serusers] UAC UDP to Proxy TCP... Problem

Greger,
 
Thank you for your response.
See the attached ethereal trace.
NOTA:
 
66.xxx.xxx.xx is the aterisk UAC
200.xxx.xxx.xx is my proxy server
20.196.xxx.xx is the TCP Carrier GW
 
The ACK my proxy send to the TCP GW - after have received 200 OK - have the request line including the transport=tcp indication
 
The contact headers are ok in each case.
The Bye Sent  by my proxy does not have the request line transport=tcp. But we have already a one way communication before.
if the asterisk does not send a bye, the call is terminated by the TCP GW. I think it is because of a time out from the TCP GW.
 
Christian
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de fevereiro de 2006 04:35
To: cthomas@canalwest.com; serusers@lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] UAC UDP to Proxy TCP... Problem

Seems like you have done your research and what you write seems reasonable. It's difficult to give you an answer without having a complete ngrep trace. However, you should also look at the Record-Route and Route headers...
g-)
----- Original Message -----
From: Christian Thomas
To: serusers@lists.iptel.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 6:33 PM
Subject: [Serusers] UAC UDP to Proxy TCP... Problem

Hi everybody,
 
I have a UDP2TCP problem with Ser. (0.9-4)
The UACs connected to my SER Proxy are all UDP. When I use some carriers to connect them to PSTN The Carrier Proxy / GW could talk UDP or TCP. It depends on the destination.
Each time the Carrier GW want to talk TCP, the contact field is correct and contains the 'transport=tcp' mention. all seems to be correct and, after a complete reading about this subject in the list, I trust that using t_relay() must do the right translation and send response via TCP to the Carrier GW when this one is transport=tcp declared.
If I Check the message for an Ack or a BYE sent to the TCP GW the uri is correct :
the transport=tcp is added. 
 Request-Line: ACK sip:50033299848400@200.1xx.xx.xx:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0
I have red that this is sufficient to let SER understand that it must be sent via TCP.
unfortunately, this message is ent thru UDP.
May I force with a t_relay_to_tcp ? As this case depends on the carrier dynamic routing  it could be complicated because of the need to know the destination to script t_relay_to_tco(uri, port)... If anybody has the trick or any advice...
Other thing related, when TCP is the transport mode from the Carrier GW and I forward staefully to the UAC (Asterisk) the call failed between Asterisk as UAC and the carrier GW.
I wondering it was because the Carrier Gw didn't receive an ACK TCP from my server..
 
Well I'm completely lost... as you can feel with my message...
I need Help.. But don't cal me Harry ;)
 
Regards,
 
Christian Thomas


_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers