14 Apr
2010
14 Apr
'10
12:42 p.m.
Hi Daniel
Just to let you know I followed your advice and we deployed kamailio 3.0.1.
We are still doing several tests, but I can say already we don't have
anymroe errors with tcp connections ...
Cheers
Pascal
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On 03/11/2010 05:58 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
2010/3/11 Pascal
Maugeri<pascal.maugeri(a)gmail.com>om>:
I have seen clients sending registration over UDP requiring to be contacted
via TCP.
To be sure it registers via TCP check the configuration of the phone and
watch the sip traffic with ngrep (or ethereal) to see the transport layer
protocol.
Connecting from server to a client behind nat is possible only if you have
port forwarding on your nat box to phone IP address. Therefore, if the phone
connects via tcp it must keep the connection open. If for some reason it
closes, it must re-open it. Otherwise it becomes unreachable.
In the server side there are lot of tcp options to tune the behavior and
optimize. I do suggest using version 3.0 for a much improved TCP
architecture and implementation (including asynchronous tcp -- in case you
deal with lot of tcp connections, then this saves you).
http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/core-cookbook:3.0.x#tcp_parameters
Worth to mention as well that you can change the value of tcp parameters at
runtime without need to restart (e.g., connecting timeout, send timeout,
etc) using sercmd.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio SIP Router Masterclass, Berlin, March 22-26, 2010
* http://www.asipto.com/index.php/sip-router-masterclass/
Does such NOTIFY go to a TCP registered user? Of
course if there is
This must be present in the initial SUBSCRIBE. However if the client
is behind NAT and uses TCP it's required some way to mantain the
keepalive in the router, if not a future NOTIFY could not arrive. A
common approach is the client sending some TCP data through the
existing connection (i.e.<CRLF><CRLF> as defined in defat-oubound,
now RFC XXXX).
not an existing TCP connection between Kamailio
and the final natted
user then it's not possible to send such NOTIFY.
Do you mean that the user is sending "transport=tcp" in his Contact
header ?