15 Jul
2011
15 Jul
'11
3:32 p.m.
Hi Sebastian,
On 7/15/11 11:42 AM, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Klaus Darilion
<klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
I am a bit confused about what you explain above, with "named
route is
executed before the default reply_route". Can you send like the
structure of the config for this case? I mean the routes involved and
the calls of t_on_reply(). Is it like for example:
route {
...
$avp(xyz) = 1;
t_on_reply("ABC");
t_relay();
exit;
}
onreply_route[ABC] {
...
xlog("avp(xyz) is $avp(xyz)\n");
...
}
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Oct 10-13, Berlin: http://asipto.com/u/kat
http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda
The named reply routes are only executed if
t_on_reply() was called for
the request. This reply route will be executed after the default
reply-route. It is triggered by tm module.
I just inserted a new reply_route,
which just prints out some
variables (and does avp_print). From what I see in the logs now, the
named route is executed before the default reply_route. And there are
no AVPs in the named route. Actually, I don't even need the AVPs in
the replies, I need them to be there, when the 200 OK comes in or in
failure route when the call is cancelled. In both cases the AVPs are
<null> if i directly address them.
Any more ideas?