15 Feb
2004
15 Feb
'04
8:05 p.m.
I want to send an updated uri to the exec'd script but beyond 2 updates
to the uri ser seems to fail to update the uri..
so when the failure route keeps being called the last number it had just
tried is sent but that doesn't seem to happen and I'm wondering if this
is a bug in ser as it would seem so.. to me at least.
Say the hunt number is dialed.. route(2) is called.. which calls the
script.. the hunt number is sent properly to the script and the script
returns the first number in the hunt properly.. (06 in my example). Now
if that number is busy ser drops to the failure_route[2] and 06 is sent
back to the script and the script returns 07.. ok now if that number is
busy failure_route[2] should be called again. But instead of sending 07
to the the script as the number last dialed (or current uri) ser sends
06 again to the script which to me seems like an incorrect behavior..?
Kapil Dhawan wrote:
could you pls explain ..how are you implementing call
hunting.....well i
am also implementing SER and need same feature by this time i am
writning it in module...do u have any other possibility....
From: Matt Hess <mhess(a)livewirenet.com>
To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] hunt groups?
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:01:04 -0700
I'm trying to do hunt groups in ser..
I've come to the conclusion that to do multiple hunt groups I need to
call an external script that replies with the next uri to call when it
looks at the current one being sent to it.. ie:
sent returned
3039930010 3039930006
3039930006 3039930007
3039930007 3039930008
3039930008 3039930006
However on entering the failure route I have found that the current
uri is not being updated to reflect the one it has received.. so ser
keeps looping on the first 2 numbers in the hunt..
here are my route blocks..
route[2] {
log(1, "LOG: entered hunt route");
t_on_failure("2");
exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl");
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
failure_route[2] {
log(1, "LOG: Hit failure_route 2");
t_on_failure("2");
exec_dset("/usr/local/ser/huntgroup.pl");
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
so on the example above it routes to the first 06 and 07 numbers
properly but when I would think 07 would be the uri sent to the perl
script an environment check sees that 06 is still being sent as the
$SIP_USER
any ideas as to what I need to do?
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_________________________________________________________________
Masterpieces made affordable! Buy art prints.
http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42736.asp MSN Shopping.