28 Sep
2020
28 Sep
'20
4:15 p.m.
I think the node is still marked as inactive although it send a request
for dialog data. Some lines bevor the skipping lines
Sep 28 15:01:45 voip-lab-proxy02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28828]: DEBUG: dmq
[message.c:50]: ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message [KDMQ
sip:dialog@192.168.253.77:5062]
Sep 28 15:01:45 voip-lab-proxy02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28828]: DEBUG: dmq
[message.c:65]: ki_dmq_handle_message_rc(): dmq_handle_message peer
found: dialog
Am 28.09.20 um 15:07 schrieb Björn Klasen:
Hi just had a log in debug log of the secondary node.
Here I found the following lines
Sep 28 15:01:45 voip-lab-proxy02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28835]: DEBUG:
dialog [dlg_dmq.c:87]: dlg_dmq_send(): sending dmq broadcast...
Sep 28 15:01:45 voip-lab-proxy02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28835]: DEBUG: dmq
[dmq_funcs.c:166]: bcast_dmq_message1(): skipping node
sip:192.168.253.78:5062
Sep 28 15:01:45 voip-lab-proxy02 /usr/sbin/kamailio[28835]: DEBUG: dmq
[dmq_funcs.c:166]: bcast_dmq_message1(): skipping node
sip:192.168.253.77:5062
But why does it skip the first node (IP 192.168.253.78)?
Am 28.09.20 um 14:47 schrieb Björn Klasen:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I'm just testing Kamailio 5.4.1 with dialog replication over DMQ.
> This seems to work very good. Dialogs are replicated without problems.
>
> When I'm restarting one node I would have expected, that all dialogs
> are synced again, just like in dmq_usrloc.
>
> But this does not happen. After a restart the nodes dialog-list is
> empty.
>
> Did I miss somethin? Is there a special parameter that I have to set?
>
> BR, Björn
>
--
Björn Klasen, Specialist
TNG Stadtnetz GmbH, Network Management (VoIP)
Projensdorfer Straße 324
24106 Kiel
Germany
T +49 431/ 530530
F +49 431/ 7097-555
mailto: bklasen(a)tng.de
http://www.tng.de
Register: Amtsgericht Kiel HRB 6002 KI
Executive board (Geschäftsführung): Dr.-Ing. Volkmar Hausberg,
Sven Schade, Carsten Tolkmit, Dr. Sven Willert
Tax-Id (Steuernr.): 2029047020, VAT-Id (USt-Id): DE225201428