16 Mar
2015
16 Mar
'15
2:46 p.m.
request_route
2015-03-16 15:43 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Is this used in request_route or in failure_route or
other routing block?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 12:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
If I use
$ru="sip:"+$tU+"@"+$(du{s.select,1,:});
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
}
I see
t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: no branches for forwarding
Mar 16 11:36:04 Kamailio kamailio[4335]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]:
sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server
error occurred (6/SL)
if I use append_branch()
for single client - thats is ok but 2 invites going to client.
So client may pickup call and it successfully established.
2015-03-16 13:24 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>om>:
Hello,
instead of seturi use:
$ru = "sip:" + $tU + "@" + $(du{s.select,1,:});
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16/03/15 05:44, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
Now. when I use
seturi("sip:$tU@$(du{s.select,1,:})");
I see error at my log
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1264]: new_t(): ERROR: new_t: uri invalid
ERROR: tm [t_lookup.c:1411]: t_newtran(): ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:363]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error
used: Regretfully, we were not able to process the URI (479/SL)
As i see error generate twice maby because I ure t_on branch() route
2015-03-16 7:18 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook(a)gmail.com>om>:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
Hello. I try to call multi[ple endpoints from my
server using
append_branch. It works fine but when I have only one endpoint - kamailio
generate 2 INVITE requests to it.
As I understand it is original request and the next one is branch.
I used seturi() before for sending original reqest to destination, but I
can not see this function at kamailio 4.3.
Kamailio 4.3 uses send() dunnction? but it works at stateless mode. I
need analog of it or seturi that works at statefull mode.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
listsr-users@lists.sip-router.orghttp://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users