On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 03:35:59AM -0700, ycaner wrote:
it is simple way to solve this and it is softphone product problem. If i did configuration as you said , it consumes so much socket , CPU and etc. in future.
I can't imagine this will be a significant amount of cpu/traffic. I can only speak for my users, but near 100% is behind NAT or a statefull firewall. Treating the users as always NATed avoids a lot of headaches so far.
I wonder that is there a something about it on ietf or protocol flows. I think it is wrong.
What do you think about it.
I can't find any info about this learning process via the Contact header. But I have seen this kind of behavior with Patton SmartNode equipment, in these appliances this learning is related to the UACs keep-alive mechanism. This further supported my idea to never trust any endpoint device :)