Re: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine

When I make internal call between 2 internal subscribers (yate softphones). The subscriber B answeres, after all the Kamailio/rtpengine sends a 200ok  reply to the subscriber A, but the softphone does not recognize it (it does not ACK it). I think it is because of its SDP which the RTPENGINE replaced with it's one. is it possible to instruct the RTPENGINE not to insert these extra lines  or should I use, say LUA, to remove these extra SDP lines. What is the correct  way here On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:36 PM, Dmitry <mbike2000ru(a)yahoo.com> wrote: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine Does it mean that rtpengine_manage() determine the session state itself? i.e it is not needed to find out in the configuration file that INVITE contains SDP or not because rtpengine_manage() determins internally what this INVITE is? am I correct? On Friday, May 6, 2016 5:52 PM, Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com> wrote: ‎It's just a description of stateful behaviour in relation to the SDP offer-answer cycle. ‎ -- Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC 1447 Peachtree Street NE, Suite 700 Atlanta, GA 30309 United States Tel: +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) / +1-678-954-0671 (direct) Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/ Sent from my BlackBerry.   Original Message   From: Dmitry Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 07:43 To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Reply To: Dmitry Subject: [SR-Users] question about RTPengine _______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users