Thank you Jamie for the great tip! It did work very well :-) The sip gateway dropped the first 183 for unknown Call-ID. sip gateway didn't send BYE msg back after second 183 msg, call was successfully connected.
SER is really powerful enough that can almost do everything you imagined ^_^
Regards,
----- Original Message ----- From: Jamie Yukes jyukes@gmail.com Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 09:00:42 -0400 To: ksabc@lycos.com, serusers@lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] How to drop 183 msg
As a total kludge, you may try changing the packet sufficiently such that the sip phone will drop it itself...
replace_all( "Call-ID: .*@", "Call-ID: XXX@" );
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 14:46:15 +0200, Bogdan-Andrei IANCU iancu@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
It is not possible to drop a reply from reply_route - you can change the reply, but not to drop it entirely. bogdan
ks lf wrote:
SIP termination Gateway send two 183 "Session in Progress" msg back to SER, first one without SDP, second one with SDP ( for remote ring back tone purpose ), but this crashed the caller party sip phone somehow, how can we drop the first 183 msg in SER.CFG? We just need forward the second 183 msg to caller party, but don't forwarding the first one, how to porgram onreply_route part? just use break sentense doesn't help. Thanks your great help.
Regards,
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Jamie Yukes Global Connect http://www.gc1.com/