16 Jun
2010
16 Jun
'10
11:56 a.m.
On 6/16/10 10:32 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 06/16/2010 04:27 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
do you get any error message? The only case
when is printed a dbg
message is when no credentials for the realm in challenge are found.
Test to see if uac_auth() returns false or true.
CSeq is not incremented is a know limitation:
http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/uac.html#id2899892
Tracking CSeq will require getting into b2bua-like since there can be
many auth requests.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Asterisk SIP Router Masterclass
Malaga, Spain - July 5-9, 2010
http://www.asipto.com/
2010/6/16 Alex
Balashov<abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>om>:
Am I misreading 3261 Section 22.3?
If a proxy were to resubmit a request adding a
Proxy-Authorization header field value, it would need
to increment the CSeq in the new request. However, this
would cause the UAC that submitted the original request to
discard a response from the UAS, as the CSeq value would
be different.
Since the proxy is the authentication actor, I assumed this is how it
should be done. On the other hand, if the purpose of the UAC module
is to "spoof" a challenge response as if it really came from the UAC,
I suppose this is not appropriate.
Either way, regardless of CSeq, the Proxy-Authorization header is not
being added to the resent request. Unless I am doing something wrong,
I believe uac_auth() doesn't work. Also, CSeq is not being incremented.
Why do you want CSeq being incremented by the proxy? Note that the UAS
still knows nothing about the request until it receives the first
INVITE (with credentials) from he proxy.