Howdy,
I've been scouring the RFCs looking for this verbiage. One of our developers here is telling me that is a mistake, that the 487 needs to come from the far end. Do you know where I might find more information about this topic?
It seems to me that the ser proxy is responding to the cancel with a 487. If I had to make it come from the far end can that be accomplished with ser?
Thank you for your feedback,
Regards, ---greg
On Aug 25, 2005, at 1:47 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote:
That's right! CANCEL and 487 are hob-by-hob, if the corresponding INVITE was forwarded stateful.
regards klaus
Greg Fausak wrote:
I've got a call trace that shows an INVITE being CANCELed, the CANCEL is hop to hop. I had thought the 487 was generated at the other end and came all the way back, but my call traces indicate that the 487 is being generated hop to hop as well. That's not right, is it? ---greg _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers