Hello Daniel,
Thanks for the reply. Indeed there is, not sure how I managed to miss that.
And it wasn't about the schema after all:
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:277]:
check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - <core>
[core/parser/parse_uri.c:1254]: parse_uri(): uri too short:
<<BC><EA><8F>>
(3)
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - <core>
[core/parser/parse_uri.c:1328]: parse_sip_msg_uri(): bad uri
<<BC><EA><8F>>
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: WARNING: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:282]:
check_ruri_scheme(): failed to parse request uri [<BC><EA><8F>]
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - sanity
[sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 0
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[909]: ERROR: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - <script>: Malformed SIP
request from 172.30.154.189:5060
Still, not sure what the problem is though...
BR,
George
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 at 09:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
when the ruri scheme check fails, there should be another debug message
saying that. Have you pasted all log messages for the failure case?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 07.07.20 22:23, George Diamantopoulos wrote:
Sorry, I realised I copy pasted wrong log messages for Call 1. Here's the
relevant part showing success for call 1 in contrast with Call 2:
grep 2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d kamailio.log | egrep
'check_ruri_scheme|w_sanity_check' | grep ACK
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[907]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d(a)voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:277]:
check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[907]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d(a)voip.domain.com - sanity [sanity.c:297]:
check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme passed
Jul 7 18:42:11 lbpub0-stage-lhe0-cn1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[907]: DEBUG: {1
<null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d(a)voip.domain.com - sanity
[sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 1
On Tue, 7 Jul 2020 at 21:34, George Diamantopoulos <georgediam(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello all,
I'm not 100% sure this is the only culprit in an issue I'm investigating,
but superficially it appears that RURI scheme sanity module checks from the
default config (flags 17895 in REQINIT) fail if the RURI in an ACK
following a 487 includes parameters. Example from two calls from a kamailio
instance acting as registrar/usrloc server, INVITE RURIs are after usrloc
lookup:
Call 1: INVITE sip:voip-test-gd@172.17.173.14:5063 SIP/2.0
Call 2: INVITE sip:voip-test-user-02@10.2.24.142:32768;line=moo62e08
SIP/2.0
These INVITEs produce no complaints. Later, the same registrar produces
ACKs to acknowledge 487 (thus, same transaction ACKs) responses from the
next proxy in the path following a CANCEL:
Call 1: ACK sip:voip-test-gd@172.17.173.14:5063 SIP/2.0
Call 2: ACK sip:voip-test-user-02@10.2.24.142:32768;line=moo62e08 SIP/2.0
The next proxy (which produced/relayed the 487) processes the ACK for
Call 1 successfully, but sanity_check at the proxy drops the request for
Call 2 with:
DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - sanity
[sanity.c:277]: check_ruri_scheme(): check_ruri_scheme entered
DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
08679c4228983f9e65f3b47f767b6e07(a)voip.domain.com - sanity
[sanity_mod.c:254]: w_sanity_check(): sanity checks result: 0
whereas Call 1 seems OK:
DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d(a)voip.domain.com - sanity
[sanity.c:305]: check_required_headers(): check_required_headers entered
DEBUG: {1 <null> 172.30.154.189 102 ACK
2a859fcc4e1c8f840191a81d7c16e76d(a)voip.domain.com - sanity
[sanity.c:313]: check_required_headers(): check_required_headers passed
Could this be a bug in sanity module? Is there anything one can do in
config which could result in illegal ACKs being produced for hop-by-hop
transactions? schema appears to be sip: in both cases...
Thank you. Best regards,
George
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding:
https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla