Hello,
not sure how you compiled the kamailio, but you can e.g. execute “make clean; make” in the source directory and it should compile all again.
Refer to e.g. this: https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/devel/makefile-system/ for the old make system.
Cheers,
Henning
From: ale Gural via sr-users <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2025 10:57 AM
To: miconda@gmail.com
Cc: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>; ale Gural <alegural.kamailio@gmail.com>
Subject: [SR-Users] Re: hfl not working as well
Hi,
It seems that didn't compile the new file, added in the parse_diversion.c file some log, but not show it in kamailio.log
after compile got:
version: kamailio 5.8.6 (x86_64/linux) fb71db
flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, MEM_JOIN_FREE, Q_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES, TLS_PTHREAD_MUTEX_SHARED
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS 1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_SEND_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
id: fb71db
compiled on 11:43:38 Jun 13 2025 with gcc 11.4.1
I am still trying to understand why not replace the old file,
if you have any Idea why, appreciate your help.
Thanks!
On Fri, Jun 13, 2025 at 9:34 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
I tested during development and worked fine with your example header. Do try with the development version to validate it or not, send kamailio -v if still fails along with the entire sip message used during your tests.
Cheers,
DanielOn 12.06.25 19:37, ale Gural wrote:
Thanks for your quick response,
I replaced the new file parser_diversion.c in /src/core/parser/ and compiler again, same result.
Thanks!
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 6:48 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you try with latest git master branch? I pushed a commit trying to fix it, the problem was in the way the parser computed the length of the Diversion value, not considering quoted values.
Cheers,
DanielOn 12.06.25 11:25, ale Gural via sr-users wrote:
ale Gural
12:24 PM (0 minutes ago)
to Benoit
On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 12:04 PM Benoit Panizzon <benoit.panizzon@imp.ch> wrote:
Hi
> Does anyone know why using $(hfl(Diversion)[0]) cuts off the last part of
> the value, while hdr doesn't?
$hfl tries to de-serialize comma (and probably semicolon) separated one
line header. So maybe it stumbles over something which causes it to
believe the last part belongs to another header?
Is he missing part in [1]?
What does the complete Diversion header causing the issue look like?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G - Leiter Commerce Kunden
______________________________________________________
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 Pratteln Fax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions -- sr-users@lists.kamailio.orgTo unsubscribe send an email to sr-users-leave@lists.kamailio.orgImportant: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!--Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/micondaKamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.comKamailio Scalability Training - Online, June 16-19, 2025 -- asipto.com--Daniel-Constantin Mierla (@ asipto.com)twitter.com/miconda -- linkedin.com/in/micondaKamailio Consultancy, Training and Development Services -- asipto.comKamailio Scalability Training - Online, June 16-19, 2025 -- asipto.com
