On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

do not arm failure route for CANCEL (avoid calling t_on_failure("1") if method is CANCEL). Also, why you arm failure route after t_relay?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 11/20/08 11:51, Krunal Patel wrote:

Hi

Here is snap of my cfg which show how it handles cancel..
@@@@@@@@
route()
{
...
...
if (method=="CANCEL") {
route(1);
exit;
}
...
...
}

route[1] {
t_on_reply("1");
if (!t_relay()) {
sl_reply_error();
} else
{
xlog( " -------------- cheked t reply --- \n ");
}
t_on_failure("1");
}

@@@@@@@@

Please let me know what I am doing wrong.
Thanks,
Krunal Patel

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hello,

On 11/18/08 09:50, Krunal Patel wrote:

Hi,

When I am sending high volume calls to openser , I am getting
WARNING:tm:run_failure_handlers: no UAC or CANCEL support (1, 0).
Please help me to find out the cause of it.
I am using openser 1.2.3. <http://1.2.3.> <http://1.2.3.>

do you set failure route for CANCEL?

1.2.x is no longer supported, being a rather old release, it is
highly recommended to upgrade to 1.4, there are a lot o bug fixed
and improvements.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.kamailio.org
http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com