Interesting. I have a number of Quintum PSTN gateways that I'm trying to
pass traffic through using SER and I am having a heck of a time with the
configuration. Asterisk works fine but not scaleable enough. My UAC's are
behind different NAT routers and some work with rtpproxy and some don't.
Some work (Linksys) with just nathelper but wouldn't work with rtpproxy.
Does anyone have a good experience with SER and Quintum? I would like to
share info and experience.
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Iqbal
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:28 PM
To: Klaus Darilion
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] From header
its REGISTER to the proxy
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
If the quinntum box is not registered to a proxy, but
a "standalone"
SIP device, than it is fine for the box to use its IP address (as this
is the SIP URI where it can be reached from outside).
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
just what I thought, so basically the proxy FQDN
of the proxy the UA
is attached to, which is why I am wondering why quintum sends it own
IP address
Iqbal
Klaus Darilion wrote:
The From: header should contain the AoR (the
canonical sip URI, the
public known SIP URI), e.g: klaus3002(a)iptel.org
regards
klaus
Iqbal wrote:
Hi
The From request in REGISTER and INVITE, what should be in the
domain segment of it, should it be, the IP address of the UA, the
proxy or what, I seem to be getting conflicting results with a
quintum, and wanted to double check
Iqbal
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
.
.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers