Document and ser.cfg updated.
Ladislav
samuel wrote:
First of all, apologies Ladislav, I thought
Greger was doing the
document from the onsip times...and since the doc is not signed I just
guessed.
I have debug at maximum so I can get all possible errors (9, which is
more than the upper limit I think :P)
I haven't time to test NAT staff but it seems that it might work...
About the rtpproxy socket, I just mentioned because if people find the
document and start using it as config file there'll be a new top-10
question in the list: "rtpproxy does not work" because the socket is
not the rtpproxy default socket.
Samuel.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org