Hi,
See inline
On 11/6/06, Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com <Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com> wrote:
Hi Andrey
On SIP AS side sip stack is running on port 5060, then this packet send
to Application running over on top of it. Is their any issue with this
scenario?
I think there might be... I just think there should be some
consistency between your SIP and UDP/TCP packets. If UDP source port
is 4141, for example, then your Contact header (and From header too),
should have this port. If someone else has some good ideas, plz,
comment.
In SIP packet its 5060 only. Port is changed only in
UDP/TCP packets.
But I think their shouldn't be anything wrong with this cause SIP Stack
utilizes only sip packets (inside of UDP). And SER is replying to it.
Your ethereal traces on SER side show 100 and 407 responses are marked
as black and red color (i use ethereal 0.99.x). That means something
is wrong.
Regards
Kamal Mann
Regards,
Andrey.
-----Original Message-----
From: Andrey Kuprianov [mailto:andrey.kouprianov@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:52 AM
To: serusers(a)iptel.org
Subject: Re: [serusers]: trusted table(permissions module)
Hi Kamal,
I noticed one strange thing in your traces. INVITE from SIP-AS is sent
from port 4141 (!) to port 5060, but 100 and 407 response from SER is
sent back to port 5060 (not port 4141)! Can you, please, explain why?
Andrey.
On 11/6/06, Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com <Kamal.Mann(a)t-systems.com> wrote:
Hi Andrey
Please find ethereal packet capture enclosed. SER n/w dump is
'SER_SERVER'
and SIP_AS n/w dump is 'SAS_SERVER'.
SER IP = 10.25.119.155
SIP AS IP = 10.25.119.156
To URI is registered at SER end (dilip)
From URI is Application Name (example) and neither created nor
registered
(WakeUpService) with SER.
Thanks in anticipation
Kamal Mann
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers