Hmm, do you have port set for the records in the address table? I notice
you print it in the log message...
Cheers,
Daniel
On 18.05.21 11:15, Romain Untereiner wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Thanks for your quick answer!
I indeed need to identify the group ID too.
Here’s how I handle it (inspired
from
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/permissions.html#permission…
<https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.5.x/modules/permissions.html#permissions.f.allow_source_address>):
‘''
$var(group) = allow_source_address_group();
if ($var(group) != -1) {
xlog("L_INFO", "$si : $sp is allowed through group:
$var(group)\n");
[...]
} else {
xlog("L_INFO", "$si : $sp is not allowed -
allow_source_address_group returned -1\n");
xlog("L_INFO", "Rejecting $ci with 403 'Forbidden'\n");
sl_send_reply("403", "Forbidden");
exit;
}
‘''
Best regards,
*Romain Untereiner*
Co founder at /Cantoo/ <https://www.cantoo.co>
www.cantoo.co <www.cantoo.co>
Le 18 mai 2021 à 08:44 +0200, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com>om>, a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On 17.05.21 12:11, Romain Untereiner wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I am having some trouble with Permissions module of Kamailio,
>> regarding the allow_source_address_group() function. In 99.9% of the
>> cases the IP of our partner is allowed as expected, but randomly it
>> can fail (returning -1 for the same IP address that was allowed for
>> many other calls in the meantime).
>>
>> I can’t understand why it fails and why only « sometimes » - I confirm
>> this append on the same Kamailio box, with same IP and Port of the
>> partner.
>>
>> In my custom logs:
>> « X.X.X.X:YYYY is allowed through group Z » —> as expected
>> and sometimes (like 1% of the cases): « X.X.X.X:YYYY is not allowed
>> - allow_source_address_group returned -1»
>>
>> It is maybe to note that in the address table, this range is defined
>> as /24 and not /32. Until now it never happened on /32 defined address
>> but I don’t know if it can be correlated.
>>
>> Would someone have a clue on this?
>>
>> Versions:
>> - kamailio 5.5.0 (x86_64/linux) d4c1a1
>> - debian 9 stretch
>> - postgresql 11.7
>
> how do you test the return code of the function? Paste here the snippet
> of the config where the function is used.
>
> Then, do you really need the goup id of the address or just to match the
> address?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --
www.asipto.com
>
www.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
> May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone)
> *
https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/
>
Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
May 17-20, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - June 7-10, 2021 (America Timezone)
*