I am not behind a NAT.
If there are bindings from other registrations, I guess that they must be stored in some MySQL table of SCSCF. I had a look and I saw that it was empty. Then I had a look at the impu_contact table and I saw some entries. I removed them manually. However when I try to register the multiple contacts are still there in the 200 Ok.
Tell me which logs do you need and I will attach them.
Thanks again
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:03:10 +0200
From: jason.penton@smilecoms.com
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Ims Kamailio issue - "403 Forbidden - You must register first with a S-CSCF"
Hi Victor,
For the first problem, are you behind a nat?
Secondly, the 2 contacts coming back in the 200OK will be because you still have an old binding in the scscf....
I can't really help much without a log file.
Cheers
Jason
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Victor Huertas Garcia <vhuertas@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have installed an IMS core using Kamailio and FHoSS.
In this environment, I am able to successfully register Bob and Alice with the same S-CSCF.
However, when I try to make a voice call between Bob and Alice it is not established.
The code received is "403 Forbidden - You must register first with a S-CSCF". This code is generated by the P-CSCF because the Contact Header that is checked against the database ("location" table) it is not found.
When I look up manually the "location" MySQL table, there are two things that surprise me:
- The Contact header (AOR column content) that is included in the INVITE Requet URI when entering in the P-CSCF is present in the table. So why the pcscf_is_registered ("location") returns false?
- When Bob registers two Contacts are stored, the first one is the one included in the REGISTER message generated from Bob IMS Client. However, the second Contact is the one present in the 200 OK message (coming from the S-CSCF) which is different from the one present in the REGISTER (the only thing different is the UDP port). Why the S-CSCF (with the default kamailio.cfg) doesn't the Contact header and changes the UDP port? Is this the standard behaviour? I don't think so...
Thanks for your attention
Regards,
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
| Jason Penton | ||||
| Senior Manager: Applications and Services | ||||
| Smile Communications Pty (Ltd) | ||||
| ||||
| jason.penton@smilecoms.com | ||||
www.smilecoms.com |
This email is subject to the disclaimer of Smile Communications at http://www.smilecoms.com/home/email-disclaimer/
_______________________________________________ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users